Lies.
Subversion.
Deception.
Collusion.
But not with Russia.
Collusion between President Obama, the CIA, the FBI, the Director of National Intelligence, and radical media… unethical and illegal corruption.
And it worked.
The public believed the lies… and millions still do.
And Donald Trump’s presidency was undermined and thwarted for 4 years.
It was a treasonous conspiracy against a presidential candidate – and a duly elected President of the United States of America.
It was perhaps the largest and most sophisticated political scandal in American history.
And the radical left media is ignoring or mocking the story.
Here are 8 things every American needs to know that the biased media isn’t going to tell you:
- The email hacking of the DNC in 2016 was central to the Trump-Russia collusion narrative.[1]
In May, 2016, the Democratic National Committee hired CrowdStrike, a private cybersecurity company, to investigate a security breach to DNC email servers.
The hacking into the DNC servers supposedly happened during March or April, but the DNC didn’t realize it had been hacked until May.[2]
By this time it was clear that Donald Trump was going to be the Republican nominee for president.
Those who disliked the possibility of a Trump presidency assumed he was colluding with Russia – and that Russia was helping him by hacking into the DNC servers to find “dirt” on Hillary Clinton and her campaign.
In July, WikiLeaks published thousands of DNC emails.
- The FBI and the National Security Agency (NSA) had “low confidence” that Russia was behind the DNC hack.
The FBI received the final report from CrowdStrike regarding the DNC hack on August 31, 2016.[3]
The report was heavily redacted.
FBI Assistant Director James Trainor said he “doubted its completeness because he knew that outside counsel had reviewed it.”[4]
On September 12, the FBI and NSA published an Intelligence Community Assessment saying the DNC emails that had been published online could not be “correlated” with Russian operatives.[5]
- The DHS and ODNI manufactured intelligence to accuse Russia of stealing the DNC emails.[6]
On October 7, 2016, the Department of Homeland Security – headed by Jeh Johnson – and the Office of the Director of National Intelligence – headed by James Clapper – issued a joint statement.
The statement accused Russia of hacking the DNC and leaking the files with the intent “to interfere with the U.S. election process.”[7]
It claimed the entire intelligence community – all 12 agencies – agreed with the assessment described in the press release.
This joint statement was a lie because:
- the FBI and the NSA had not signed off on the accusation of Russian involvement;
- the CrowdStrike report had not provided any evidence of Russian involvement
It was manufactured intelligence, designed to falsely accuse and thereby discredit a presidential candidate.
- President Obama approved the October 7th DHS and ODNI statement.
The document is titled, Joint Statement from the Department Of Homeland Security and Office of the Director of National Intelligence on Election Security.
It begins as follows: “The U.S. Intelligence Community (USIC) is confident that the Russian Government directed the recent compromises of e-mails from US persons and institutions, including from US political organizations. The recent disclosures of alleged hacked e-mails on sites like DCLeaks.com and WikiLeaks and by the Guccifer 2.0 online persona are consistent with the methods and motivations of Russian-directed efforts. These thefts and disclosures are intended to interfere with the US election process.”[8]
At the time of this statement, no one in the intelligence community had received images of the DNC servers.
Server images are equivalent to a virtual copy of the crime scene.
They had been taken by CrowdStrike, but had not been delivered to the FBI as requested.
President Obama approved manufactured intelligence, created out of thin air with no credible evidence to support it.
- After Donald Trump was elected President, the intelligence community concluded Russia did NOT influence the election outcome.
The Presidential Daily Briefing – prepared by the intelligence community for President Obama, stated, “We assess that Russian and criminal actors did not impact recent US election results by conducting malicious cyber activities against election infrastructure.”[9]
This Presidential Daily Briefing (PDB) – which is normally shared with the media and the public – was pulled from distribution by a senior official in James Clapper’s DNI office.[10]
He sent an email to “All” saying, “Based on some new guidance, we are going to push back publication of the PDB. It will not run tomorrow and is not likely to run until next week.”[11]
- On December 9, 2016, a treasonous conspiracy against a duly elected president began.
On this day, President Obama called a secret meeting to create a new “election meddling” narrative. These were the attendees:
- James Clapper – Director of National Intelligence
- John Brennan – CIA Director
- Susan Rice – National Security Advisor
- John Kerry – Secretary of State
- Brian McKeon – Under Secretary of Defense
- Loretta Lynch – Attorney General
- Andrew McCabe – Deputy Director of the FBI
- Avril Haines – Deputy National Security Advisor
After the meeting, each attendee received an email titled, “POTUS Tasking on Russia Election Meddling.”
The purpose of each member’s tasks was to create a new intelligence “assessment per the President’s request.”[12]
This began the leaking of blatantly false information about a non-existent “secret assessment” that Russia influenced the outcome of the 2016 presidential election.
Tulsi Gabbard, Director of National Intelligence – who is releasing the bombshell documents detailing the treasonous conspiracy behind the Russia collusion hoax – said in an interview, “So the effect of what President Obama and his senior national security team did was subvert the will of the American people, undermining our democratic republic, and enacting what would be essentially a years-long coup against President Trump, who was duly elected by the American people.”[13]
- The treasonous conspiracy on steroids.
The alleged hack of the DNC servers during the 2016 presidential campaign – and subsequent publication by WikiLeaks and others of thousands of private emails – was always the basis of the Russia collusion hoax.
Another key piece of “evidence” for the Russia collusion hoax was the discredited Steele Dossier.[14]
The Steele Dossier – paid for by the DNC and the Clinton campaign, and previously debunked by the CIA – was used to create yet another false intelligence assessment on January 6, 2017.[15]
FBI Director James Comey claimed legitimacy of the new false intelligence assessment on January 23rd:
“There should be no fuzz on this whatsoever. The Russians interfered in our election during the 2016 cycle. They did it with purpose, they did it with sophistication, they did it with overwhelming technical efforts…”[16]
This resulted in the Robert Mueller special counsel investigation regarding Russian interference in the 2016 election.
The investigation began in May 2017 and ended in March 2019… costing over $50 million tax dollars.
It found no evidence that President Trump or his campaign conspired with Russia to influence the outcome of the 2016 presidential election.
But treason had been committed, and irreparable damage to President Trump’s first term agenda had been inflicted.
- Troubling inconsistencies and questions about the DNC server hack remain.
CrowdStrike, the private cybersecurity company hired by the DNC, began their work on May 1, 2016.
They installed 200 sensors and other protective technologies on the DNC network.
Special Counsel Robert Mueller alleged that the emails were stolen between about May 25th and June 1st.
CrowdStrike claims that no hack occurred during that timeframe.[17]
CrowdStrike president Shawn Henry told congressional investigators that his company didn’t have concrete evidence that emails had been stolen from the DNC[18].
CrowdStrike also never provided the FBI with unredacted reports of their work for the DNC – and they never provided images of the servers to the intelligence community.
Why the subterfuge?
Is it possible that the DNC leaked their own emails to WikiLeaks, or someone in the DNC upset with the DNC, and went to great lengths to make it look as if the Russians did it so they could accuse Trump of colluding with Vladimir Putin?
The so-called “evidence” for the DNC email hack is vague and incomplete at best – and contradictory and suspicious as well.
As more documents are released and more details are discovered, criminal prosecutions may follow.
The story is still unfolding. We will provide an update in the near future.
Action:
- Get my book “The Deep State: 15 Surprising Dangers You Should Know” to see how shocking the problem is, its cause and its solution.
Click HERE to order on Amazon.
You can also get an autographed edition online or by phone at 615-814-6633.
To order by mail, you can send a check for $26.13 (including shipping) payable to Media Specialists and send it to this address:
Media Specialists
1313 4th Ave N
Nashville, TN 37208
What do you think? Email me at [email protected]
[1] Ivan Pentchoukov, https://www.theepochtimes.com/us/fbi-and-nsa-had-low-confidence-that-russia-was-behind-the-dnc-hack-5889723
[2] Mike Levine, https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/russia-probe-timeline-moscow-mueller/story?id=57427441
[3] Ivan Pentchoukov, https://www.theepochtimes.com/us/obama-approved-accusing-russia-of-dnc-hack-before-fbi-received-dnc-server-images-4514033
[4] Ibid.
[5] Ivan Pentchoukov, https://www.theepochtimes.com/us/fbi-and-nsa-had-low-confidence-that-russia-was-behind-the-dnc-hack-5889723
[6] https://www.dhs.gov/archive/news/2016/10/07/joint-statement-department-homeland-security-and-office-director-national
[7] Ivan Pentchoukov, https://www.theepochtimes.com/us/fbi-and-nsa-had-low-confidence-that-russia-was-behind-the-dnc-hack-5889723
[8] https://www.dhs.gov/archive/news/2016/10/07/joint-statement-department-homeland-security-and-office-director-national
[9] Brian Chai, https://www.westernjournal.com/tulsi-gabbard-uncovers-treasonous-conspiracy-within-obama-admin-releases-bombshell-documents/?utm_source=email&utm_medium=breaking-special&utm_campaign=news-alert&utm_content=2025-07-18
[10] Matt Taibbi, https://www.racket.news/p/note-on-new-trump-russia-disclosures
[11] Ibid.
[12] Ibid.
[13] Daniel Chaitan, https://www.dailywire.com/news/years-long-coup-gabbard-teases-release-of-more-details-on-obama-russia-intel-controversy
[14] Maggie Miller, https://www.realclearinvestigations.com/video/2025/07/15/russiagate_reexamined_potential_perjury_after_cia_report_contradicts_obama_officials_sworn_testimony_1122824.html?mc_cid=b87d910ddd&mc_eid=18dbaaf564
[15] https://www.dni.gov/index.php/newsroom/press-releases/press-releases-2025/4086-pr-15-25
[16] https://www.foxnews.com/video/6375892330112
[17] Ivan Pentchoukov, https://www.theepochtimes.com/us/900-page-senate-russia-report-includes-no-evidence-for-how-emails-were-taken-from-dnc-3475184
[18] Ivan Pentchoukov, https://www.theepochtimes.com/us/obama-approved-accusing-russia-of-dnc-hack-before-fbi-received-dnc-server-images-4514033