▼ Key Takeaways
- Saturday’s October 17 event emphasizes early voting and voting preparation to flip Republican states and districts to Democrats.
- Indivisible Action’s email explicitly describes ambitions to defeat Republicans in states and districts it believes can become competitive.
- Its plan includes millions of planned calls and texts as outreach goals.
- Community events serve organizing purposes to influence election outcomes even when they receive little national coverage.
- Election-defense training is a separate component intended to help progressive candidates and causes win.
It’s the latest and biggest “No Kings” rally — whose hidden purpose is to flip Republican states and districts to pro-Socialist – and the conservative media are getting it all wrong.
Why?
You’ll see the signs. You’ll hear the speeches. You’ll watch the crowds.
It’s a new, organized, trained strategy to turn out Democrat voters by an extra 10% or more.
If all you see are signs and people marching, you’ll miss the most consequential part of this coming Saturday’s “No Kings” event.
Behind the public demonstrations is an organizing effort designed to turn the marches into an invisible army — and political enthusiasm into personal contact, volunteers, and votes.
Indivisible Action, the group behind the march, spells out its election plan in unmistakable language.
Here are eight things you need to know before the march this Saturday, October 17:
1. The electoral objective of turning the nation Socialist is written in their own words… including flipping Republican seats to Democrat.
Consider this message I uncovered from Indivisible Action to its supporters:
“Voters talking to voters is how we’ll win in November. It’s how we’ll flip states and districts that Republicans thought were safely red just a few months ago.”
“It’s how we’re going to bypass corporate media, neutralize the GOP spending advantage, reclaim our power, and mark the beginning of the end of the Trump regime.”
That is their language. That is their stated ambition.
They want personal conversations and local organization to help create a surprising Democrat win in the midterms.
2. They have set specific goals for millions of voter contacts – something the Republicans don’t have.
How does Indivisible Action intend to pursue its objectives?
They lay out these goals by Election Day:
● Make more than 5.5 million calls in select districts.
● Text more than 3.5 million voters in select districts.
● Knock on tens of thousands of doors in select districts.
● Train more than 10,000 election “defense” leaders to help turn out questionable voters in critical battleground states and districts.
And then after the election in November, maintain that relationship for the 2028 election.
3. Their “No Kings rally is different.
Another document I received from Indivisible explains:
“No Kings: Vote Early will look different than previous mobilizations.”
Some communities will still have large rallies. Others will have block parties, cookouts, or marches to the polls.
The message also says:
“The message and actions will also be tailored to your local context.”
A smaller gathering may generate less dramatic media attention while still accomplishing an organizing objective. A neighborhood event can create conversations, build relationships, and help drive the vote at a higher level than anyone expected.
Crowd size alone will not tell the whole story.
4. The early voting they are pushing addresses a simple problem: life gets in the way.
Someone can intend to vote and still never cast a ballot if they wait until the election day of November 3rd.
A child gets sick. Work runs late. Transportation falls through. A family emergency changes the day.
That is the practical logic behind the early-voting emphasis.
You generate a higher voter turnout of your identified voters.
From a marketing perspective, the distinction is familiar.
Interest is one step. Follow-through is another. It’s needed to maximize the vote.
An enthusiastic attendee, a social-media follower, and a voter who has actually cast a ballot are three different things.
This program is designed to help close those gaps.
5. They are betting on personal conversations to compete with advertising.
Indivisible knows that grassroots get-out-the-vote work can overcome Republicans even in red districts.
An advertisement delivers a message. A conversation will uncover a question, identify a practical obstacle, and create an opportunity to identify a voter… even find another volunteer, leader, or donor.
That’s why they have a program called Neighbor2Neighbor.
This is the part of an election campaign that will never appear in your news feed: people contacting other people, one conversation at a time.
They have an app they identify and use to train. They want you to find just 10 people. They keep it easy.
6. The “election-defense” — the first time in history.
The goal of Indivisible training more than 10,000 election “defense leaders” is another part of the plan.
Indivisible’s public “Election Defense Corps” and a program called “Hands Off Our Vote” are to protect questionable votes that could be rejected.
Its battleground organizing includes Alaska, Georgia, Iowa, Michigan, North Carolina, Ohio, and Texas.
This effort extends beyond encouraging someone to vote. It includes looking for election problems before, during, and after the election.
7. National publicity is being connected to local relationships.
In earlier articles on the “No Kings” rallies, I emphasized the importance of what happens after people attend a demonstration.
The reality is the start of data collection on a massive scale to identify, register voters, train, and change the election outcome.
That remains central to this story.
Indivisible connects early voter conversations, local organizing, volunteer training, and get-out-the-vote capacity.
Think about the sequence.
A national event attracts attention. Local organizers offer a place to participate. Some participants become volunteers. Those volunteers continue reaching people after the signs have been put away.
8. The most important result of “No Kings” is the least visible.
The most revealing sentence in the Indivisible Action document is this one:
“It’s this on-the-ground organizing that will ultimately make the difference on Election Day.”
Media and politicians attending the “No Kings” event — but only noticing the signs, speeches, or crowd estimates — miss out on what the organizers are trying to accomplish.
To understand Saturday’s significance, ask what follows:
How many participants stay involved? How many conversations result in completed voting plans? What local organizations remain active afterward?
Those questions will tell us more than the most provocative sign in the crowd.
My warning is straightforward: Don’t confuse the visibility of a rally with the full scope of its purpose.
The organizers are describing a sustained effort to connect public participation with voting and local power.
Across America, local, county, state and congressional races have startled the so-called experts as the radical left has flipped Republican seats to Democrat and Socialist winners.
When you watch Saturday’s coverage, look beyond the crowd. Look for the organization and the follow-through.
What do you think the coverage is missing? Send me your thoughts at [email protected].
Action:
- See my past “No Kings articles:
- Click HERE to read The “No Kings March:” The Left’s Secret Voter Recruitment Machine – 5 Things You Need to Know about this Strategy.
- Click HERE to read No Kings March: 4 Critical Things You Must Know.
- Click HERE to read The “No Kings March” Exposed: 8 Things Every American Must Know.
- Click HERE to read Shocking Double Standard: “No Kings” Leaders and Protesters Silent During the COVID Pandemic – 4 Disturbing and Dangerous Consequences.
- Use the Voter Guide to help you vote by clicking HERE.
FAQs:
Q: What is different about this No Kings event?
A: Organizers are emphasizing early voting and voting preparation. Local formats may include rallies, cookouts, block parties, and walks to the polls.
Q: Is No Kings the same thing as Indivisible Action?
A: No. No Kings is a broader coalition that describes its events as nonpartisan. The supplied fundraising email comes from Indivisible Action and states explicit partisan electoral goals.
Q: Are the outreach numbers confirmed results?
A: No. The email describes goals: more than 5.5 million calls, texts to more than 3.5 million voters, tens of thousands of door knocks, and training for more than 10,000 election defense leaders.
Q: Why emphasize voting early?
A: Where available, voting early allows people to complete the process before Election Day disruptions arise. Elsewhere, the emphasis is on understanding available options and preparing a voting plan.
Q; Does this prove the organization will change the election outcome?
A: No. It documents an intended strategy and its scale. Measuring its actual effect would require evidence about execution, participation, and election results.
About Craig Huey:
Craig Huey is a nationally recognized author, speaker, and publisher of The Huey Alert and Direct Marketing Update. Craig appears on national media such as FOX, FOX Business, Newsmax and more. He also co-hosts The Huey Alert Podcast with his wife Shelly and helps business leaders, Christians, conservatives, libertarians, young people and more understand the intersection of faith, politics, and freedom.